# HRA/WPP × IDID review co-sign request

Subject: Confirming the HRA/WPP typology review

Thank you for reviewing the kidney ASCT+B typology pilot at the HRA/WPP
hackathon. I captured the following result:

> **Observed break:** [one sentence describing the reviewed failure]
>
> **Cross-tool consequence:** [fact, producer, consumers, and behavior]
>
> **Decision:** [extension-sufficient / grounding-context-envelope /
> context-profile-rfc-candidate / insufficient-evidence]

Proposed talk sentence:

> "[Name or approved role/organization] reviewed Semiotic's HRA kidney pilot and
> found that **[exact reviewed finding]**, which means **[exact consequence for
> metadata, grounding, or shared context identity]**."

Please reply with one of:

1. **Approved verbatim** — I may quote the proposed sentence with your selected
   attribution.
2. **Approved with this edit:** [replacement sentence].
3. **Accurate but not for attribution** — I may report the finding
   anonymously.
4. **Not approved** — do not quote or paraphrase this as my review.

Selected attribution:

- [ ] Name and organization
- [ ] Role and organization
- [ ] Anonymous participant

No response is not approval.