The Living Ledger
Ecosystem services · 180-day teaching replay
The Living Ledger
Ecosystems do work people depend on: forests store carbon, reefs protect coasts and pollinators help crops grow. This map follows those services and the evidence used to judge whether they are changing.
A forest can remain standing while providing less of a service. Managed hives can keep crop pollination steady while wild habitat declines. Following both the ecological condition and the delivered service helps reveal those differences.
Explore a simulated 180-day record built for teaching.
Start with the service people rely on
Each flower represents an ecosystem service. Choose one to see who relies on it, what is changing and what the evidence shows.
- Selected
- Reef 14
- Who is affected
- 186K people
- How sure
- high
9 visible · 9bioregions
Reef 14
Reef 14 reached 9.6 °C-weeks of accumulated heat stress.
- Where
- Mesoamerican Caribbean
- Evidence
- validated threshold
- Confidence
- high
- Exposed
- 186K people
The claims that currently need attention
6 service systems are at Watch or higher. Data-quality alerts stay separate.
Service balance
Is nature still keeping up?
Each mark compares the condition of nature with whether the service is keeping up for people.Mark size shows how many people or livelihoods are exposed. Color shows the alert level.
Service story
What has changed over time?
Recorded values tell a clearer story than a single score. The alert line is a rule, not proof that the whole service has failed.The Living Ledger
The service is not one number
Supply, demand, use, and value are related. They are not interchangeable. When the units do not line up, there is no ratio.Any adequacy ratio shown here is defined only inside this service model and is not transferable.
Dependency / Evidence Web
What depends on this?
One network follows consequences forward. The other follows the claim backward.A careful evidence journey
How a signal earns a claim
A reading is checked before it can inform an indicator. Any unresolved record keeps the statement limited.One selected service system · 6 replay records
- 1A reading arrives
6 records from this service system entered the replay.
- 2We check it before using it
6 records have passed the checks in this replay.
- 3Then we make a limited statement
The checked records can inform an indicator, not a promise about the whole service.
Read the latest pipeline events
- Jun 13Community access assessmentaccepted
- Apr 14Community access assessmentaccepted
- Feb 13Community access assessmentaccepted
- May 26Canopy cooling deltaaccepted
- Apr 12Canopy cooling deltaaccepted
- Feb 7Canopy cooling deltaaccepted
Three warnings, three different interpretations
Inspect the Artifact Contract
Reef 14 reached 9.6 °C-weeks of accumulated heat stress.
- Claim state
- supported · observation
- Uncertainty
- This threshold supports a heat-stress claim. Coastal-protection loss is modeled. Confidence is high; evidence freshness is current.
- Scope
- Mesoamerican Caribbean ·driver
- Boundary
- Selected-system replay projection
- Transform
- Filter the fixed teaching replay to one service system and replay date, then apply the system's bounded alert rule without promoting a pressure, forecast, or model into an observed outcome.
- Event time
- 2026-07-10T00:00:00.000Z
- Snapshot
- 2026-07-12T00:00:00.000Z
- Window
- 2026-01-14T00:00:00.000Z through 2026-07-12T00:00:00.000Z
- NOAA Coral Reef Watch Degree Heating Weeksource · daily ·authored illustration
- Illustrative service demand, use, beneficiary and model inputssource · replay dependent ·authored illustration
- coral-heat-dhwregistered rule · NOAA Coral Reef Watch ·not transferable by default
No source-data or claim correction is recorded for this selected claim.
Read the service systems as a table
| Service system | Region | Condition | Adequacy | Claim | Confidence | Freshness |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mesoamerican Caribbean | 51 | 87% | validated-threshold | high | current | |
| Lower Danube | 72 | 114% | forecast-crossing | medium | current | |
| Humboldt Current | 64 | 88% | trend-change | medium | current | |
| Congo Basin | 76 | not comparable | reference-anomaly | high | current | |
| Ganges–Brahmaputra Delta | 78 | 102% | trend-change | medium | aging | |
| California Central Valley | 58 | 94% | trend-change | medium | current | |
| Chesapeake Bay | 74 | not comparable | trend-change | medium | current | |
| Whanganui River corridor | 77 | not comparable | trend-change | medium | aging | |
| Southern California urban region | 68 | 97% | data-observability | low | stale |
Download the selected finding with its sources, dates, calculations and uncertainty so another reader can check it.